tableSamuel said that 16:36 was equivalent to 72:32.What was Samuel’s error?1) The ratio was not chosen from the same columns.2) He did not look at the correct rows.3) This problem was impossible. 16:36 has no equivalent ratios.4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.HURRY PLEASE

4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.Step-by-step explanation:Given ratio is:16:36In order to find any ratio equivalent to given ratio, the ratio can be divided by a number or multiplied to a number.The equivalent ratio that is given: 72:32If we multiply the given ratio by 2: We get 32:72So,Looking at the options we can conclude that the right answer is4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.Keywords: Ratio, FractionsLearn more about ratios at:brainly.com/question/1993757brainly.com/question/2048256#LearnwithBrainly